Back to wave model home page.
 

          Issues Currently Challenging the Wave Model          
The state of play
 

 
A.G.Booth     Original on WWW 13 February 2005     Copyright © A.G.Booth 2005-2006 All rights reserved
Document ident: Last updated 22 August 2006 Issues Currently Challenging the Wave Model.  A.G.Booth
Keys: quantize quantized quantization wave equation continuum theory

   Key Issues

Welding Together Two Layers -- The main line of current development is in getting the results from the "substrate field" layer of modelling in "Dynamics of Complex Waves" expressed such that they properly support and unify the structure of the ordinary kind of wave model (Maxwell and De Broglie) that appears in "Smooth and Quantal Properties .....".  See "Welding Together" below.  2 Sep 05

The "Motive Field" -- There is work coming along in connection with the form of the quantising "ripple function" in "Smooth and Quantal Properties .....".  The general ideas of the topological nature of the charge and current fields taken as a whole are due to be expanded.  15 Aug 05

Zero Spectral Moment -- At last, as noted necessary in November 05, I have brought the spin model up to date in "Wave Topology of a Spin Mode".  It now accounts the four wave function components that are necessary to complete this kind of spin-factor model.  20 Mar 06

   Known Errors in the Main Texts

4-vector descriptions -- Descriptions of the rôle of and relationships to the electric and magnetic fields of the 4-vector potential are lacking and due for extension and improvement.  In particular it is wrongly described in "Smooth and Quantal Properties .....", though the expressions in the equations involved appear to be correct, at least as far as they go (they too may need extension to fully represent such as Aharonov-Bohm effect).  22 Aug 06

Correlation to spectrum transformation errors -- After starting my reasoning from convolution, I have used the wrong form for the spectral equivalent of the correlation function matrix equations in "Dynamics of Complex Waves".  This is due for correction at next update of that document.  See notes under Welding Together below.  22 Aug 06

    Contents

The "Document ident" shown just below the header of the paper and showing date of last update should be used to check for the specific form of the paper, in cases where that might matter.  Please communicate comments to Tony Booth.

 

   Introduction

Regarding the development of a wave model as laid out on the website wavemodel.org, this document summarises where the mission has reached and as things change keeps in focus those issues that seem to be the main obstacles to furtherance of such a model.  I am all too aware that, if this model is to make any progress it will need to deal with an array of conceptual, analytical and phenomenological challenges for a very long time to come.  Here is the current game as I see it.

For general comments on the state of play in attacking the problems please refer to the General Comments section below.  Here follow some current specific issues.

 

   Welding Together

2 Sep 05 -   The bringing together of the layers of this model still has much work to be done.  This is all concerned with evaluating the predictions of the primary model, not in adding anything to its exceedingly simple primary definition.

The deeper and definitive layer (at the higher level of abstraction) developed in "Dynamics of Complex Waves" is based upon a substrate noise field and the zero D'Alembertian equation.  In its solutions it gives rise as approximations to the more directly applicable wave system structures in the rest of the model.  These resulting approximations form the outer or secondary layer of the model (lower in its degree of abstraction from physical phenomena) and are manifested as Klein-Gordon and Maxwell equations.  This picture is developed towards electrodynamics applications in "Smooth and Quantal Properties .....".  The development of the nuclear and cosmological results suggested by the same primary model are deferred for later work.

In this electrodynamics work the relationships involving the magnetic effects are still perplexing.  The picture seems to have all the right possibilities in it, but the detail is still not watertight, at least not to my satisfaction.  One issue currently bothersome is the sense in which the magnetic couplings in the A matrix in "Smooth and Quantal...." appear to be defining a field of which the curl is the vector potential field.  That produces one order of curl differential higher than one might at first expect, and this currently needs to be justified.  Fortunately it does not upset the validity of the electric field parts of the equations, fortunate because that is all that is involved in getting the depiction of a natural quantisation of charge.  However, it will need to be just right in order to complete the picture with the magnetic field quantisation effects.

The way to put all this together in a coherent picture appears to me to be by polishing up the link from the substrate field correlations where they produce the electromagnetic field (see the θ matrix in "Dynamics of Complex Waves"), so I continue to work on achieving clear justification of causality in those structures.  Watch this space ... or send me your comments if you can see through the fog better than I can.

More recently:
1 May 06 -   Adding the analysis of the 4-vector of correlations between the substrate field and its first derivatives is clarifying this picture (The earlier analysis looked at the 4×4 matrix of correlations between first derivatives only).  Amongst other things it appears to be headed for a proper account of 4-vector potential (I was originally sceptical of the need for this).  It also appears to make good account of Aharonov-Bohm effects and their origination as wave couplings.  This material is due in the foreseeable future to bring a refinement of the rôle of Maxwell field couplings in the "Smooth and Quantal Properties ....." document and a substantial update to the "Dynamics of Complex Waves" document.

 

   Negative Frequencies or Not?

29 Apr 05 -   After a long Winter of discontent I altered the essays here in Feb 05 to deny the validity of using both conjugate frequencies (i.e. opposite signs) as being valid for each type of charge ... of course for electrodynamics it is the negative charge of electrons that mainly concerns us.

Upon further reflection I find that in this model one must revert to the form as in the original hunches and presumptions whereby both signs of frequency are always involved, and they link closely with the structure of opposite spins (not, in any case, with anti-matter as is the current convention in quantum mechanics).  As well as this being the natural approach given the mathematical form of this model, it is only by this means that the path to a full flowering of the structure of Zeeman and Stern-Gerlach effects promises to come properly together.

The structure emerging from Ediv in the new essay on Dynamics of Complex Waves supports this well enough.  A reversion of Echarge in smooth.html to its original form (with modulus of frequency) will now allow this to come together.  Work will now continue on this basis.

 

   General Comments

This project began with the objective of clarifying some issues of modelling in electrodynamics, but has reached out, like it or not, to touch matters far more general.  As is suitable to its electrodynamics remit it offers the unification of Maxwell and De Broglie waves as they appear in electronic and even, as a prospect, in nuclear processes.  It then happens that the same model suggests how gravitational effects come about.  That then is a big span of unification!

So as its first objective the project faced the question of whether a continuum model would lead usefully to an emergence of the traits of quantisation and uncertainty as are described in the current physics accounts but without the artifice of any quantal "Ansatz".  It has become clear that the answer to this question is positive.  There is a usefully simple continuum model of complex waves that displays quantal behaviour.  Along with it the question of uncertainty then pivots mainly upon understanding the full implications of the observer being no more than part of the overall system being modelled, and in that matter the rôle and processes of amplification are key.  So the underlying process is then described as a locally causal continuum model.

A possible path into the subject following those issues is via Essential Structure in Physical Observation and/or Smooth and Quantal Properties of the Complex Wave.  Any model that produces the effect of quantisation must also produce a value for the size of the quantum, or of the famous constant to which it is related called the "Fine Structure Constant".  This model is explained in that respect in the second of those two essays and the value it currently produces for the electronic charge is high by about 0.5%.  There is more work to be done in this area concerning, amongst other things, how spin affects this figure, and that work is currently ongoing with a view to obtaining good account of this discrepancy.  Anyway, what is most basically interesting is the way it demonstrates the possibility of such emergent quantisation at all.  The analysis may be a little tricky to follow in detail but the model is not at all outlandish.  The conventional "Ansatz" type of theoretical model involving wave function collapse at some point in time is thereby brought under attack, at least in its status as being in any way uniquely fundamental.

The unification that this approach produces comes about through a wave model that is actually simpler than the one with which the project set out on its investigation of electrodynamics.  At the beginning the Maxwell and De Broglie waves were modelled separately, thus requiring two forms of wave equations.  In the more recent work presented in Dynamics of Complex Waves both of these wave systems are shown to arise from a common basis and that basis is arguably simpler than either of the two original equations.  As an unsought bonus the model then also displays effects that are gravitational in nature.

As things stand it will be a little while before all of these features are presented and worked through quantitatively and in detail, but the picture presently promises that it will be possible to complete that task.

Until further checks are completed it remains unclear whether this model will survive as self-consistent and then whether it will be truly compatible with either natural phenomena or with conventional quantum mechanics and the "Standard Model" of nuclear particles.  However, it is already clear that it has value as a means of comprehension, and brings into cohesion a variety of concepts that have traditionally appeared as arbitrary and disjoint.

The prospect for accounting for the superficial aspect of the appearance of particles looks to be a routine matter, dealing with such as Compton effect, cloud and bubble chamber tracks, Stern-Gerlach phenomena, photoelectric effect, Aharonov-Bohm effect etc.  Similarly the otherwise anomalous effects of apparently non-local deviations of correlation in particle detection can be submitted to a new view in which there appears every possibility that the results will stay within the range of phenomena attributable to a locally causal, though not in detail observable, wave system.

All of this work is, on my part so far (AGB), in a state of patchwork draft, and will probably remain to some degree that way.  A complete and early conclusion over issues as widely set at these would hardly be possible.  Fortunately that more tentative approach is made workable by taking advantage of the plasticity of electronic documents and Internet methods.

The broad outline needs, as well as one or two more central pieces, a collection of secondary articles written to deal with peripheral matters such as accounting for individual phenomena.  Also it would be valuable, and at the outset perhaps not too challenging by comparison with conventional quantum field theories or the agonising many body Lagrangian problems, to make direct use of the model to set up some electrodynamic finite element computational modelling ... atomic, molecular or crystalline.  Collaboration in this work has begun, but have we any more interested parties or volunteers for such activities?  Please contact me if so.

 

   References and Background Reading

[ABo02] A.G.Booth "Essential Structure in Physical Observation"
http://wavemodel.org/obs/observ.html
 
[...] ....

 

Phone and e-mail   see foot of Wavemodel home page.
Back to wave model home page. Copyright © A.G.Booth 2005-2006 All rights reserved